babylovechild.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the babylovechild.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host babylovechild.org. Currently, hosted in Denmark and its service provider is EasySpeedy Danmark ApS .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS) containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

looking for the most recent details or links for further reading? my twitter tends to include articles for further reading, retweets of others' interesting bits and pieces, links relating to posts found here, or late breaking details that have not made it into my blog posts. the blog and baby_love_child twitter are best read in tandem. by twittericon.com recent posts today, voting opened on pound pup legacy’s seventh annual demons of adoption awards “adopted or abducted?” an initial set of shall we say highly critical impressions blogging again, a personal post- surveilling the sewer, through new eyes the industry’s “national adoption day”- a day celebrating the loss of adoptees’ civil rights of earthquakes and adoptions recent comments glossary- new terminology adoption pentagon- terminology calendar july 2018 s m t w t f s « oct 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 bastardly basics- a selection of older posts that cover some of the basics adoptee rights 101: class bastard and how to recognize a genuine adoptee rights bill the “joke’s” on us- bastard access to our own records once again bastardette picks apart the conflations and reveals the anti-autonomist core cabbage patch mentality i’ve got your *real* fake birth certificate right here, wingnut! on so called ‘the primal wound’: “personal problems” vs. political solutions “expendables”- the human toll of legislation that “compromises” us away bastard access- either we all go together or we don’t go at all- “nobody gets left behind. or forgotten.” my comment on 73 adoptee’s “compromising on adoptee access? the foot you shoot may be your own” prospect of open records makes il catholic conference fearful of potential lawsuits jessica scovil: when the foster system fails completely privacy and consent; early notes, appropriate uses and co-optations of the terms – part i – introduction on so called “secrecy” adoption as a modern feminist institutional blindspot new jersey- let a752 die: the conflation of family medical history with authentic restored access, white outs, and preemptive restraining orders among other nightmare senarios attachment quackery first full post a good article on late discovery and the consequences thereof catholic charities offers up another lifetime’s worth of lies and false “reunion” adoption as a tool of cultural genocide, the “child grabs” canadian first nations peoples have endured how’s that hague convention on intercountry adoption workin’ out for you then? china, “orphans,” and economic and legal coercion- just another example of the “baby economy” haiti, and the constant drumbeat of the demand for children just go read it… now! vietnam- the sept. 1 deadline and the demand for a new intercountry agreement amidst a landscape of fraud outsourcing reproduction, fertility tourism, and the money (or lack thereof) at the heart of it all orson mozes and the perfect symbiosis adoption subsidies for frozen corpses, more on the maryland nightmare implications of the abandonment laws, adoption financial incentives, and language tangles a critical perspective on the “baby safe haven”/babydump programs still more border babies routinely relabeled “safe haven saves” in oh, nj, mi, and ky a note concerning adoptees with sealed records, not in reunion, and the census dmitry yakolev’s / chase harrison’s death and the lingusistic objectification of adoptees high speed photolistings, will the adoptions crash and burn? how not to spend a sat. afternoon: wiffle ball, face painting, “waiting children”, and the local bomb squad well, someone had to be the first to blog “baby trader magazine!” archives october 2013 may 2012 april 2012 november 2011 august 2011 july 2011 june 2011 may 2011 march 2011 february 2011 january 2011 december 2010 november 2010 october 2010 august 2010 july 2010 june 2010 may 2010 april 2010 march 2010 february 2010 january 2010 december 2009 november 2009 october 2009 september 2009 august 2009 july 2009 june 2009 may 2009 april 2009 march 2009 february 2009 january 2009 december 2008 november 2008 october 2008 september 2008 august 2008 july 2008 june 2008 may 2008 april 2008 march 2008 february 2008 january 2008 december 2007 november 2007 october 2007 about wtf? statement on working with other orgs/activism tags today, voting opened on pound pup legacy’s seventh annual demons of adoption awards each year, pound pup legacy holds their annual demons of adoption awards. this year’s ballot can be found here . in the nomination process in the run up to the actual ballot, i wrote about my nominees and reasoning behind such: “others have already made these nominations, but i wanted to write to them specifically as the full ramifications of their actions this year haven’t been elaborated on here from quite the angle i wanted to cover. for me, this year’s nominees really come down to supreme court justices thomas and roberts along with everyone, from the marketers, to the agency, the lawyers, and the adoptive couple involved in veronica’s and the other cases slowly coming to light. i’ve been writing about nightlight, as but one example, since 2006 , but they along with others in this industry have been unleashed in new and horrific ways this year by the supreme court’s decision. while all who have been part of this process, including the other justices who supported this outcome are among those i consider part of this nomination, both justices thomas and roberts stand out for their conflict of interest, their refusal to recuse themselves, and their cynical use of the high court towards this evisceration of icwa. the ramifications of this decision for all first nations families, far beyond the details of veronica’s case itself represents almost sea change in terms of how the united states stands in relation to native kids and families. icwa, in 1978 represented an initial acknowledgement of the wrongdoing in how the u.s. had essentially strip mined native communities for their children, as if plundering any other “natural resource.” icwa was designed to prevent such abuses from taking place again. in practice, icwa was far from strong enough, not going anywhere far enough, and still native children were removed at rates that can only be described as an institutionalized form of cultural genocide, draining tribes of their kids one case at a time. instead of recognizing icwa’s inadequacies and how native children were still being commandeered, the high court shredded what little was left, leaving us in a landscape of a new open season on tribes and their children. justices roberts and thomas due to their particular relation to adoption as an institution, that of adoptive parents had a special responsibility to step back from this case. (roberts in particular, by focusing upon and embracing the eugenic concept of “blood quantum”/”blood politics” echoed the long and despicable racist history of how so many first nations peoples have been objectified, dehumanized, and moved about as little more than livestock in this nation’s long sad history.) their refusal to acknowledge their conflict of interest makes them prime candidates as nominees as they represent at the highest court in the land the tragic situation bastards and families face every day when we interact at all levels of the system with various clerks, judges, social workers, lawyers, etc.- those with all too often hidden or hidden in plain sight motivations due to their own status as a adopters. we are reduced to begging for justice from those who have their own stake and interest due to their own position on the adoption pentagon . roberts and thomas (along with the full chain of others involved in these cases) deserve this year’s nomination for two simple reasons: 1. the fact that two adoptive parents on the high court, who refused to recuse themselves, just opened the floodgates yet again to the next major boom of sovereign first nations tribal peoples having their ch

URL analysis for babylovechild.org

http://www.babylovechild.org/2010/01/03/a-good-article-on-late-discovery-and-the-consequences-thereof/
http://www.babylovechild.org/2007/10/27/cabbage-patch-mentality/
http://www.babylovechild.org/tag/australia/
http://www.babylovechild.org/2010/10/31/national-blog-posting-month-my-october-nablopomo/
http://www.babylovechild.org/2009/07/
http://www.babylovechild.org/2011/01/
http://www.babylovechild.org/about/
http://www.babylovechild.org/2009/10/
http://www.babylovechild.org/2011/07/29/adoption-is-absolutely-a-feminist-issuean-issue-feminists-must-face/
http://www.babylovechild.org/2008/07/31/high-speed-photolistings-will-the-adoptions-crash-and-burn/
http://www.babylovechild.org/about/
http://www.babylovechild.org/tag/demons-of-adoption/
http://www.babylovechild.org/tag/childrens-rights/
http://www.babylovechild.org/2012/05/01/adopted-orabducted-an-initial-set-of-shall-we-say-highly-critical-impressions/#comments
http://www.babylovechild.org/tag/nadoptam/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: BABYLOVECHILD.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D149466353-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.enom.com
Registrar URL: http://www.enom.com
Updated Date: 2017-10-21T05:28:44Z
Creation Date: 2007-10-22T01:43:03Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-10-22T01:43:03Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: eNom, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 48
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4252982646
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: C134222551-LROR
Registrant Name: Michael Doughney
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: 4423 Lehigh Road 299
Registrant City: College Park
Registrant State/Province: MD
Registrant Postal Code: 20740
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.2403918282
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: +1.2405475447
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: [email protected]
Registry Admin ID: C134222551-LROR
Admin Name: Michael Doughney
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 4423 Lehigh Road 299
Admin City: College Park
Admin State/Province: MD
Admin Postal Code: 20740
Admin Country: US
Admin Phone: +1.2403918282
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax: +1.2405475447
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: [email protected]
Registry Tech ID: C134222551-LROR
Tech Name: Michael Doughney
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: 4423 Lehigh Road 299
Tech City: College Park
Tech State/Province: MD
Tech Postal Code: 20740
Tech Country: US
Tech Phone: +1.2403918282
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: +1.2405475447
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: [email protected]
Name Server: NS1.SITELUTIONS.COM
Name Server: NS2.SITELUTIONS.COM
Name Server: NS3.SITELUTIONS.COM
Name Server: NS4.SITELUTIONS.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2018-05-22T05:09:25Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to: (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS babylovechild.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME babylovechild.org

  HANDLE D149466353-LROR

  CREATED 2007-10-22

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.SITELUTIONS.COM 45.33.97.188

  NS2.SITELUTIONS.COM 173.255.194.38

  NS3.SITELUTIONS.COM 192.241.206.246

  NS4.SITELUTIONS.COM 138.197.152.205

OWNER

  HANDLE C134222551-LROR

  NAME Michael Doughney

ADDRESS

STREET
4423 Lehigh Road 299

  CITY College Park

  STATE MD

  PCODE 20740

  COUNTRY US

  PHONE +1.2403918282

  EMAIL [email protected]

ADMIN

  HANDLE C134222551-LROR

  NAME Michael Doughney

ADDRESS

STREET
4423 Lehigh Road 299

  CITY College Park

  STATE MD

  PCODE 20740

  COUNTRY US

  PHONE +1.2403918282

  EMAIL [email protected]

TECH

  HANDLE C134222551-LROR

  NAME Michael Doughney

ADDRESS

STREET
4423 Lehigh Road 299

  CITY College Park

  STATE MD

  PCODE 20740

  COUNTRY US

  PHONE +1.2403918282

  EMAIL [email protected]

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .